|
Paper
Bags or Plastic Bags? Everything You Need to Know
by
Collin
Dunn, Corvallis, OR, USA
on
07. 9.08
from treehugger.com
Paper or
plastic bags: which is better?
It's an age old question, when it comes time to check out when
grocery shopping:
paper bag or plastic bag?
It seems like it should be an easy choice, but there's an
incredible number of details and inputs hidden in each bag. From
durability and reusability to life cycle costs, there's a lot
more to each bag than meet the eye. Let's take a look behind the
bags.
Where do brown
paper bags come from?
Paper
comes from trees -- lots and lots of trees. The logging
industry, influenced by companies like
Weyerhaeuser
and Kimberly-Clark,
is huge, and the process to get that paper bag to the grocery
store is long, sordid and exacts a heavy toll on the planet.
First, the trees are found, marked and felled in a process that
all too often involves
clear-cutting,
resulting in massive habitat destruction and long-term
ecological damage.
Mega-machinery comes in to remove the logs
from what used to be forest, either by logging trucks or even
helicopters in more remote areas. This machinery requires fossil
fuel to operate and roads to drive on, and, when done
unsustainably, logging even a small area has a large impact on
the entire ecological chain in surrounding areas.
 Part
way between trees and paper bags. Photo credit: Saly A. Morgan –
Ecoscene Corbis
Once the trees are collected, they must dry
at least three years before they can be used. More machinery is
used to strip the bark, which is then chipped into one-inch
squares and cooked under tremendous heat and pressure. This wood
stew is then "digested," with a chemical mixture of limestone
and acid, and after several hours of cooking, what was once wood
becomes pulp. It takes approximately three tons of wood chips to
make one ton of pulp.
The pulp is then washed and bleached; both
stages require thousands of gallons of clean water. Coloring is
added to more water, and is then combined in a ratio of 1 part
pulp to 400 parts water, to make paper. The pulp/water mixture
is dumped into a web of bronze wires, and the water showers
through, leaving the pulp, which, in turn, is rolled into paper.
Whew! And that's just to make the paper;
don't forget about the energy inputs -- chemical, electrical,
and fossil fuel-based -- used to transport the raw material,
turn the paper into a bag and then transport the finished paper
bag all over the world.
 Paper
recycling plants,
like the one shown above, is the best place for bags to go when
you're done with them.
Where do paper
shopping bags go when you're done with them?
When you're done using paper shopping bags, for shopping or
other household reuses, a couple of things can happen. If
minimally-inked (or printed with soy or other veggie-based inks)
they can be
composted;
otherwise, they can be recycled in most mixed-paper recycling
schemes, or they can be thrown away (which is
not
something we recommend).
If you compost them, the bags break down and
go from
paper
to a rich soil nutrient over a period of a couple of months; if
you throw them away, they'll eventually break down of the period
of many, many years (and without the handy benefits that compost
can provide). If you choose to
recycle
paper bags, then things get a little tricky.
The paper must first be re-pulped, which
usually requires a chemical process involving compounds like
hydrogen peroxide, sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide, which
bleach and separate the pulp fibers. The fibers are then cleaned
and screened to be sure they're free of anything that would
contaminate the paper-making process, and are then washed to
remove any leftover ink before being pressed and rolled into
paper, as before.
 How
are plastic bags made?
Unlike paper bags, plastic bags are typically made from oil, a
non-renewable resource. Plastics are a by-product of the
oil-refining process, accounting for about four percent of oil
production around the globe. The biggest energy input is from
the plastic bag creation process is electricity, which, in this
country, comes from coal-burning power plants at least half of
the time; the process requires enough juice to heat the
oil
up to 750 degrees Fahrenheit, where it can be separated into its
various components and molded into polymers. Plastic bags most
often come from one of the five types of polymers --
polyethylene
-- in its low-density form (LDPE), which is also known as #4
plastic.
How does
plastic bag recycling work?
Like paper, plastic can be recycled, but it isn't simple or
easy. Recycling involves essentially re-melting the bags and
re-casting the plastic, though,
according to the U.S. EPA,
manufacturing new plastic from recycled plastic requires
two-thirds of the energy used in virgin plastic manufacturing.
But, as any chef who has ever tried to re-heat a Hollondaise
sauce will tell you, the quality isn't quite as good the second
time around; the polymer chains often separate break
(thanks to reader MaryBeth for noting the difference between
"separate" and "break" -- the former implies that the chains can
come back together, which they can't), leading to a
lower-quality product.
What does that mean to you? Basically,
plastic is often downcycled -- that is, the material loses
viability and/or value in the process of recycling -- into less
functional forms, making it hard to make new plastic bags out of
old plastic bags.
 What
about biodegradable plastic bags?
Biodegradable plastic is a mixed bag (pun intended) as well;
while biopolymers like polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) and
Polylactide (PLA) are completely
biodegradable
in compost (and very, very, very slowly -- if at all -- in a
landfill) and are not made from petroleum products, they are
often derived from our food sources.
The primary feedstock for bioplastics today
is corn, which is rife
with agro-political conflict and often grown and harvested
unsustainably; because of these reasons, and because it competes
with food supply, it is not likely to be a long-term solution in
the plastics world.
Plus, some bags marked "biodegradable" are
not actually so -- they're recycled plastic mixed with
cornstarch. The cornstarch biodegrades and the plastic breaks
down into tiny little pieces but does not actually "biodegrade,"
leaving a yucky
polymer
mess (if in small pieces). The only way to avoid this? Look for
100% plant-based polymers, like the two mentioned above.
So, while it's good to have the alternative
(and to recognize the innovation it represents), bioplastics
aren't quite ready to save us from the paper or plastic debate.
 Paper
bags hold more stuff,
but plastic bags use less energy during
production and recycling. Photo: Getty Images
Paper or
plastic: A look at the facts and numbers
Further insight into the implications of using and recycling
each kind of bag can be gained from looking at overall energy,
emissions, and other life cycle-related costs of production and
recycling. According to a
life cycle analysis by Franklin Associates, Ltd,
[pdf] plastic bags create fewer airborne emissions and require
less energy during the life cycle of both types of bags per
10,000 equivalent uses -- plastic creates 9.1 cubic pounds of
solid waste vs. 45.8 cubic pounds for paper; plastic creates
17.9 pounds of atmospheric emissions vs. 64.2 pounds for paper;
plastic creates 1.8 pounds of waterborne waste vs. 31.2 pounds
for paper.
Paper bags
can hold more stuff per bag -- anywhere from 50 percent to 400
percent more, depending on how they're packed, since they hold
more volume and are sturdier. The numbers here assume that each
paper bag holds 50 percent more than each plastic bag, meaning
that it takes one and half plastic bags to equal a paper bag --
it's not a one-to-one comparison, even though plastic still
comes out ahead.
It's important to note that all of the above
numbers assume that none of the bags are recycled, which adds a
lot of negative impacts for both the paper and plastic bags; the
numbers decrease in size (and the relative impacts decrease) as
more bags are recycled. Interestingly, the numbers for paper bag
recycling get better faster -- the more that are recycled, the
lower their overall environmental impact -- but, because plastic
bags use much less to begin with, they still ends up creating
less solid and waterborne waste and airborne emissions.
Paper and
plastic bags' required energy inputs
From the same analysis, we learn that plastic also has lower
energy requirements -- these numbers are expressed in millions
of British thermal units (Btus) per 10,000 bags, again at 1.5
plastic bags for every one paper bag. Plastic bags require 9.7
million Btus, vs. 16.3 for paper bags at zero percent recycling;
even at 100% recycling rates, plastic bags still require less --
7.0 to paper's 9.1. What does that mean to me and you? Plastic
bags just take less energy to create, which is significant
because so much of our energy comes from dirty sources like
coal
and petroleum.
 The
best way to go?
A reusable bag, not a plastic bag. Anya
Hindmarch's wildly popular "I am Not a Plastic Bag" tote is
helping give the reusable bag some sex appeal.
Paper bags or
plastic bags: the conclusion
Both paper and plastic bags require lots and lots of resources
and energy, and proper recycling requires due diligence from
both consumer and municipal waste collector or private recycling
company, so there are a lot of variables that can lead to low
recycling rates.
Ultimately,
neither paper nor plastic bags
are the best choice; we think
choosing reusable canvas bags
instead is the way to go. From an energy standpoint, according
to
this Australian study,
canvas bags are 14 times better than plastic bags and 39 times
better than paper bags, assuming that canvas bags get a good
workout and are used 500 times during their life cycle. Happy
shopping!
Top
|
How Does Solar Energy Work?
by
Collin Dunn, Corvallis, OR, USA
on
03.27.08
from
treehugger.com
Photo
credit: Getty Images
For as long as our planet has spun
'round the sun, there's been solar energy
cascading down on the earth, and, for a long time -- since the
7th century B.C., when glass was used to magnify it -- humans
have been working to harness it. These days, technology is a bit
better, providing electricity, heating, lighting, and even
flight, but the point is the same: use the sun's warm glowing
warming glow for our benefit.
Solar energy vs. solar power: what's the difference?
Often used synonymously with solar
energy, solar power
is what you've got once the sun's energy has been converted to
electricity. This can be done one of two ways: heating a liquid
to produce steam and spin a generator, or through
photovoltaics (but
that's another post). For now, we'll concentrate on how to use
the
massive and largely untapped
potential that exists with solar
energy. But first, some
basics.
Photo
credit: Getty Images
What is solar energy?
Short answer: the light and heat provided by the sun. A
slightly longer answer: after running the gauntlet from an
average of 93 million miles away, through the various layers of
atmosphere and atmospheric conditions (clouds, pollutants, dust
and the like), about half of the solar energy is absorbed by
water and land, with the other half reflected and re-radiated
back into space. The half that makes it is absorbed by oceans,
land masses and plants; in the ocean, the energy drives heat and
wind-driven currents (like the Gulf Stream); on land, the energy
is absorbed and creates heat, and the little bit that's left is
absorbed by plants and converted to chemical energy through a
process we all know as photosynthesis.
Photo
credit: Getty Images
How does solar energy work?
Outside of the three scenarios above,
solar energy usually requires a little human input to really
work (photosynthesis, which helps grow crops for food and fuel,
is a notable exception). This help can come in lots of different
forms, from architecture and urban planning, which uses
techniques to maximize light and heat from the sun to our
benefit in our buildings, to
solar thermal, the most
widely used category of solar energy technology, including
solar cooking,
water distillation and purification
and lots more, to
heating water for our use
and
desalination.
But, by far, solar energy's most
talked-about use is electricity generation. For now,
photovoltaic (PV) cells and panels
remain the most-used method for turning sun into electricity.
Basically, photovoltaics cause
photons from sunlight to knock
electrons into a higher state of energy, creating electricity.
Photovoltaic production has been doubling every two years,
increasing by an average of 48 percent each year since 2002,
making it the world’s fastest-growing energy technology.
But it's not alone in the solar world;
concentrating solar
systems use lenses, mirrors and tracking systems to focus a
large area of sunlight into a small, concentrated beam, which is
then used to generate electricity. This can be accomplished
using a trough system; by allowing direct sunlight to hit
troughs, the
solar collectors concentrate it
into a single area that boils liquid in order to make steam,
which in turn moves turbines to make electricity. This
up-and-coming technology can be made even more efficient with
the use of a solar tower, which is just what it
sounds like: a tower that uses careful sun tracking to
concentrate solar energy near its top. There are various other
technologies that can create solar power from solar energy, but,
for now, these remain the most popular and most viable.
Photo
credit: Getty Images
Advantages of solar energy
Solar's biggest advantage is that there's so
much of it. The total
solar energy available
to the earth is approximately 3850 zettajoules (ZJ) per year,
while worldwide energy consumption was 0.471 ZJ in 2004,
according to the
US Department of Energy.
Even if you aren't a
solar panel installer,
you can tell that there's way more solar energy available than
the world will ever need. Solar energy is also terrifically
versatile; as we mentioned above, it can be used to help grow
food and fuel, light, heat and modulate the temperatures in our
homes, disinfect and desalinate water, and more. And, once you
figure out how to best maximize the available energy, solar is
the gift that keeps on giving; as long as the sun doth shine,
solar energy will be available for its myriad uses.
Disadvantages of solar energy
Solar energy's disadvantages can be pretty
well boiled down to one thing: cost, at least for using it as
electricity. It takes a lot of land and costs a lot of cash to
be worthwhile, as most types of solar cells require large
surface areas to achieve average efficiency, and the silicon
used in many of today's cells is also very expensive. Pollution
and
weather can further cut
back their efficiency, which, of course, increases the cost over
time.
And though solar energy will always be
available on a macro scale, it isn't always available on an
hour-to-hour scale, because it doesn't work when the sun isn't
out (which always happens at night and sometimes happen due to
weather). Storing the energy in batteries for use during these
times cuts back on the efficiency further. And, of course, if
you live somewhere that doesn't have good solar energy exposure,
there isn't much you can do. You gotta have the sun.
Photo
credit: Getty Images
Further solar power reading in
TreeHugger
Together, solar energy and solar power is a
huge, and hugely popular, topic here at TreeHugger. It seems
like every week we're reporting
the largest solar farm ever
or
efficiency breakthroughs
for converting it to electricity. We even have a
whole category dedicated to solar,
but if that isn't enough to quench your thirst for sun-powered
knowledge, check in with the
International Solar Energy Society,
the
American Solar Energy Association,
the
Canadian Solar Industry Association
and the
Mexican Solar Energy Association,
for starters (there's also the
European Solar Thermal Industry
Federation, of course). And stay tuned for more, much
more, on the wonderful world of solar.
Get more solar info at How Stuff
Works.
Plug in to more green knowledge with
our
Green Basics column,
which appears Thursdays here at TreeHugger.
Top
Your Carbon Footprint: Calculating, Reducing and Offsetting Your
Impact
by
Collin Dunn, Corvallis, OR, USA
on
02.14.08
In
addition to metrics like
ecological footprint,
each of us (and each of the products and services we use and
consume every day) has a
carbon footprint; it's a way to measure the
relative impact of our actions -- as individuals, as businesses,
communities and countries, as we eat, work, travel, play, etc.
-- in terms of the contribution made to
global climate change.
Measured in carbon emissions (usually in pounds, tons or
kilograms), it's become an increasingly useful and popular tool
to help contextualize global warming in our daily routines and
lives.
What is a carbon footprint?
A
carbon footprint is
the total amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse
gases emitted over the full life cycle of a product or service,
and everything has one, from the computer you used to find this
article to the next meal you eat (and the one after that, and
after that, and so on...) to the shoe that will leave a physical
footprint on the ground the next time you walk outside. But
that's only part of the story.
Calculating
carbon footprints
First of all, carbon footprints can be
calculated in one of two ways: using a Life Cycle Assessment
(LCA) method (more accurate and specific), or it can be
restricted to the immediately attributable emissions from energy
use of
fossil fuels (more
general). To use your car's carbon footprint as an example: the
first method would take into account all carbon emissions
required to build the car (including all the metal,
plastic, glass and
other materials), drive the car and dispose of the car; the
second would account only for the fossil fuels that resulted
from building, driving and disposing of it.
Further,
there's more than one way to run the numbers, depending on how
they're going to be used. Top-down calculations, like those done
in the world map above and the US state map below, that
calculate per capita carbon footprints, take total emissions
from a country (or other high-level group, organization, etc.)
and divide these emissions among the residents or otherwise
applicable group. Bottom-up calculations, like with your car's
carbon emissions from the example above, sum attributable carbon
emissions from individual actions.
Okay, so everything has a carbon footprint, and each can be
measured a couple different ways, but it's not just a matter of
carbon dioxide, though that is the most common of greenhouse
gases (GHGs) other than water vapor; other GHGs include (but
aren't limited to)
methane, ozone,
nitrous oxide, sulfur hexafluoride, hydrofluorocarbons,
perfluorocarbons and
chlorofluorocarbons
(see the
IPCC list of greenhouse gases
for a more thorough list). Given this, still, most carbon
footprint calculations include all applicable gases, as they all
contribute to the greenhouse effect and our persistently warming
globe.
"What is my carbon footprint?" Calculating your own footprint
Though a fairly complex calculation, with many variables that
are different for each person, carbon footprint calculations
generally include energy used to power our homes and transport,
including travel by car, airplane, rail and other public
transport, as well as all the consumables we use on a regular
(and irregular) basis; many of the individual factors above can
be calculated separately (e.g. an individual carbon footprint
for your home, travel, food, etc.). Once you understand what
goes in to your carbon footprint, and, probably more
importantly, what your carbon footprint is, you can start
reducing it; indeed, for as many ways as there are to create a
carbon footprint, there are ways to reduce it.
Increasing
the efficiency of our energy use, reducing our energy use and
changing a few habits (like
eating less meat,
eating more local food,
not traveling by airplane
as much) are some of the quick, easy ways to cut back on the
size our individual carbon footprints.
Where do carbon offsets fit in carbon footprints?
After increasing efficiency and reducing use, carbon offsets are
also an increasingly popular (and increasingly controversial)
way to help mitigate our carbon footprints -- see TreeHugger's
How to Green Your Carbon Offsets
guide for more on that. But the point remains: there are many,
many ways to reduce and even eliminate your carbon footprint;
most every article you'll read on TreeHugger will be related to
carbon footprints and emissions, though some more directly than
others.
Top
Offshore Drilling- Worth the Oil, or False Hope

Credit: Pete Turner/Getty Images
With fuel prices and consumption dominating the news—not to
mention our country’s future energy policy—we offer a quick
primer on the complex subject of
offshore drilling. How much oil do we currently produce from
offshore drilling, and how much might we potentially recover?
What’s the status of the moratorium banning offshore drilling in
various areas? What are the environmental risks? And perhaps
most importantly, what is the psychological impact of thinking
that offshore oil holds promise as a source of abundant,
less-expensive oil when nothing could be farther from the truth?
Offshore Drilling: Background Info
The term offshore drilling refers to the extracting of oil
from fields that lie beneath the ocean floor, anywhere from
a few hundred feet to 200 miles off the coast. The first
offshore well was drilled in 1887 from a wooden wharf off
Summerland, California; technology improvements have made it
possible to drill in deeper water and farther from shore
ever since. Today, some 4,000 platforms operate in the U.S.
federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico, primarily off the
coastlines of Louisiana and Texas, and off the coast of
Alaska, producing approximately 565 million barrels of oil
per year, according to the
U.S. Energy Information Administration's overview of
offshore activity. U.S. offshore oil production of 565
million barrels per year equates to roughly 1.5 million
barrels per day; contrast that figure with U.S. current oil
consumption of 21 million barrels per day.
Offshore Drilling: What’s the Fuss
The
debate about offshore drilling stems from questions over
how much oil potentially could be recovered from underwater
fields versus the time and cost, both in dollars and
environmental impact, related to that process. Common
misperceptions notwithstanding, the debate does NOT stem
from notions that offshore drilling could eliminate U.S.
need for foreign oil (at current consumption, the U.S. uses
8 billion barrels of oil per year; conventionally
recoverable oil from offshore drilling is thought to be 18
billion barrels total ever—not per year). The debate does
NOT stem from notions that offshore drilling would guarantee
lower fuel prices (oil is a global commodity, and U.S.
production is not big enough to influence global prices).

Credit: David McNew/Getty Images
Offshore Drilling: Environmental Risks
Environmental risks associated with offshore drilling
include discharges or spills of toxic materials, interference
with marine life, damage to coastal habitats, and effects on the
economic base of coastal communities. Recent research suggests
that transporting the oil poses greater threats than the
drilling process itself. In Louisiana, the 10,000 miles of
canals dug to transport oil and lay pipelines contribute to
coastal erosion because the canals crisscross the state’s
coastal wetlands. While technology improvements have lessened
the occurrence of oil spills in the last 40 years, the
Minerals
Management Service, a bureau in the U.S. Department of the
Interior that manages the nation's natural gas, oil and other
mineral resources on the outer continental shelf, projects about
one oil spill per year of at least 1,000 barrels in the Gulf of
Mexico over the next 40 years. Every three to four years, it
says, a spill of at least 10,000 barrels can be expected. Those
spills could potentially hit the beaches of western Florida,
Alabama, Louisiana, and Texas.
Offshore Drilling: The Moratorium
Rights to U.S. offshore areas are shared between the states and
the federal government according to various acts passed over the
years. Specifically, the states have jurisdiction over any
natural resources within 3.45 miles of their coastline (except
Texas and the west coast of Florida where the jurisdiction
extends to 10.35 miles), and the U.S. has rights up to 200 miles
off the coastline. Offshore drilling has been banned in various
areas thought to be particularly environmentally sensitive over
the years. An offshore oil moratorium that had been in effect
since 1981 expired October 1, 2008. With the lifting of the ban,
areas in the Gulf of Mexico can be opened up for drilling by the
federal government. Additionally, areas off the coasts of
California, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia
can be opened up if those states approve. According to an
Nov. 12, 2008, MMS press release, the agency has already
begun the process for approving leases off the coast of
Virginia. However, offshore drilling in new areas won't deliver
a drop of oil for ten years, according to numbers cited by the
Bush administration last year. In fact, the U.S. Energy
Information Administration recently did a detailed study of the
likely outcome of offshore drilling for their Annual Energy
Outlook 2007, and concluded that increased access would not have
a significant impact on domestic crude oil production or prices
before 2030.

Credit: Kim Steele/Getty Images
Offshore Drilling: False Hope
It’s too soon to tell what the real impact of the moratorium
being lifted will be, especially in light of the new Obama
administration. But the psychological impact of knowing there is
more oil available to be drilled may be a negative for
Americans’ energy-mindedness. “Thinking that there is more oil
to be drilled offshore gives people a false sense of hope that
there’s actually enough oil out there to make us energy
independent,” says Jonathan Dorn, staff researcher at the
Earth
Policy Institute. “Nothing could be farther from the truth.
The DOE data shows that there’s an insignificant amount of
proven oil reserves, plus it will take five or 10 years to drill
the oil given the existing backlog in the offshore fleet and
other factors.” A similar view is shared by
Sierra Club
executive director Carl Pope: “All the debate about drilling
this year accomplished nothing other than serving as a
distraction from real energy solutions. Every time Congress
tries to implement real clean energy solutions, the oil industry
and its allies demand a ransom. Once the politically-charged
election season is over we will be able to revisit this issue as
part of a comprehensive energy bill that moves us away from
dependence on oil and invests in clean energy solutions.”
Offshore Drilling: Facts and Figures
Credit:
Karen Kasmauski/Getty Images
- Offshore drilling currently accounts for 30 percent of
total U.S. oil production.
- The United States currently produces approximately 1.5
millions barrels of oil per day from offshore drilling, and
consumes nearly 21 million barrels of oil per day.
- The United States currently consumes nearly 8 billion
barrels of oil per year.
- The Minerals Management Service estimated there were 76
billion barrels of “remaining undiscovered technically
recoverable” oil in U.S. offshore regions, but this estimate
represents the “potential hydrocarbons of an area that can
be produced using current technology, without any
consideration to economic feasibility.” Of this 76 billion
barrels, 18 billion are considered “conventionally
recoverable.”
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration Overview
report.
- One barrel equals 42 million gallons of crude oil.
- Of the crude oil consumed in the U.S., 66 percent is
imported.
- U.S. oil production currently occurs onshore in the
lower 48 states (2.9 million barrels per day), offshore (1.4
million barrels per day primarily in the Gulf of Mexico,
plus 0.7 million barrels per day off Alaska).
- Lifting the moratoria on drilling in the Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) would reduce the price of a gallon
of gasoline by at most a few cents—and this would not be
seen for at least another decade.
- Oil is traded as a global commodity and its price is set
on the world market. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC) could simply reduce exports to negate even
the nominal potential price reduction.
Top
|